Rosary in the Witches’ Mud (El aquelarre o El gran cabrón, Francisco de Goya)

Image
Witches’ Sabbath or The Great He-Goat by Francisco de Goya.

In Room 67 of the Prado’s Villanueva Building, the air carries museum coolness and a soft shuffle of shoes, and the Black Paintings hang with the gravity of weather in place of décor, as if Madrid’s river fog had learned to harden into pigment and keep its appointments.¹ You step close to Witches’ Sabbath, or the Great He-GoatEl aquelarre—and the first lesson comes fast: horn, veil, mouths, mud, each element offering a front face of the rite.² A deeper seeing asks for a theft of breath, a borrowing of posture, a trial of sympathy that slips under the paint and takes its seat among the women. You try to look from the inside of the semicircle, from the side of the white-veiled kneeler, and the gallery’s polite hush turns into a thick communal listening, the kind a village knows when a name hovers on the verge of utterance. In that borrowed perspective, a woman’s fear behaves like a neighbour, close enough to warm the cheek, close enough to betray; the goat’s darkness gains the weight of sanctioned speech; the crowd’s lean becomes a law.³

Goya carried this congregation into being late, after courts, after tapestries and their bright civic theatre, after the etiquette of royal faces where power asked to appear as nature. He arrived from Aragón—Fuendetodos’ hard earth and Zaragoza’s clerical stone—through apprenticeship and ascent, through the Enlightenment’s sharp grammar and its hunger for clean reason, until invasion and reprisal fractured that grammar into shards that could cut a tongue.⁴ He had trained his hand to speak in public: the cartoon designs, the portraits where a sash and a hand on a hip shaped a whole political sentence. He had trained his hand to whisper in copper: Los Caprichos, then The Disasters of War, that acid litany where bodies teach theology by falling.⁵ When he laid oil straight onto the dry plaster of his Quinta del Sordo (House of the Deaf Man), the wall turned into a witness that resisted folding and filing, an interior chapel of history where confession required only the act of looking.⁶

The title travels between registers, like rumour passed from mouth to mouth: El gran cabrón (the great billy-goat) in Antonio Brugada’s inventory, then later museum language of El aquelarre, a witches’ sabbath staged as a night assembly.⁷ Yet the Spain surrounding the mural had already practised modern enchantments: slogans that borrow the voice of prayer, loyalist piety sharpened into a blade, denunciation that turns neighbour into witness. The Trienio’s brief constitutional daylight, then the absolutist recoil, filled Madrid with proclamations, arrests, clubs, spies, arguments in cafés that died into silence when a stranger entered.⁸ In that air, superstition served as costume for politics, and politics learned to feed on the old energies of the confessional. Goya, old, deaf, seasoned in survival, watched suspicion thicken until it gained weight, and he placed a congregation on his wall, a people compelled to attend its own spectacle as if public life had become a compulsory liturgy performed in mud.⁹

Look at the architecture of the crowd, how it sits along a long shallow arc, pushing the eye toward the goat, though the goat blocks the eye with his bulk and forces vision to slide across shoulders, scarves, hollowed cheeks. Light falls in patches, catching a pale headscarf near the centre like a small mercy, striking the face of a younger figure in tawny cloth whose eyes drift toward the viewer, then dissolving into murk where mouths open like wounds. The horizon rides high; the sky turns into a bruised ceiling that offers little depth, while the ground reads as scraped and granular, pigment dragged dry across an abrasive surface until grit becomes sensation. In Warsaw, in winter, when tram doors sigh and crowds press forward with a shared impatience, a similar arc forms—bodies closing around a single point of attention—yet here the point speaks in horns.

Goya had painted assemblies of sorcery decades earlier for the Osuna circle, where witches offered fashionable shiver and enlightened mockery, irrationality displayed as specimen beneath salon light.¹⁰ In the Quinta, the theatre hardens into civic anatomy. Old women’s faces resemble masks carved by hunger; men, half-buried in shadow, bring the sense of a mixed crowd, since fear recruits across gender when power offers permission. The goat presides with a certainty that resembles clerical authority, and the gathering, fixed upon him, takes the posture of people who have surrendered judgment to a voice claiming access to hidden causes. Stoichita once spoke of Goya’s late world as carnival turned sour—festival collapsing into dread—yet the collapse carries order: an epistemology under pressure, a community choosing what counts as truth while punishment waits for dissent.¹¹

A small thing shifts the whole rite. It sits low, near the kneeling figure’s hem, almost beneath scholarship’s usual lamp: a dotted chain of dark points in the sludge, unevenly spaced, holding a faint linear continuity, as if a cord had once carried them and a hand had once counted through them toward mercy. I take them for rosary beads reduced to pellets by mud and haste.¹² They lie between the veiled presence and the goat’s dominion like a bridge made from debris, devotion turned to punctuation on the ground. With that dotted chain, the sabbath ceases to feel like a simple inversion of Catholic worship and begins to read as worship’s own fracture, prayer drafted into the public machinery of accusation until it becomes evidence underfoot.

With beads in the mud, the goat’s silhouette echoes a confessor’s outline, and the crowd’s fixed attention resembles penitents who have learned that speech secures survival. The women’s faces—creased, expectant, half-lit—carry the expression of interrogation as much as enchantment. A civic sacrament emerges: coerced consensus, a gathering where the devilish presider stands for any institution that converts spiritual language into governance. The beads register a quiet indictment: faith has slipped from fingers that tremble, and the ground continues to demand reverence, as if the dirt itself had learned the rhythms of kneeling.

The kneeling figure in white intensifies that hinge between private conscience and public declaration. Viewers call her victim, novice, offering; yet she also behaves as a surrogate for the viewer, the one body whose face remains withheld, whose identity stays unassigned, whose posture resembles attendance under compulsion. The veil carries penitential memory; the figure’s placement at the threshold between us and them carries the old borderland ache—Vilnius streets where tongues shift between Polish and Lithuanian, where a church bell and a market cry share the same air, where a person learns to guard speech in public and keep truth in the ribs. The beads beside her suggest innocence entering already entangled in ritual, already trained in motions of devotion, already caught in a language that power has learned to exploit.

Technique sharpens the political theology. These murals began as companions to daily life, absorbing smoke, candlelight, winter damp, hanging with the permanence of architecture until a later century tore them free and mounted them on canvas, trimming away more than a metre of the original composition.¹³ Paint behaves here like bruised skin: dragged, lifted, pushed into matte passages where faces emerge and dissolve, individuality yielding to collective pressure until the crowd becomes a single organism of attention. The very vulnerability of small marks—those beadlike dots surviving the violence of transfer, consolidation, restoration—grants them stubborn weight, like marginalia that persists after rebinding.

—Father, is it sin to look?
—Child, sin begins when looking becomes hunger.

The exchange arrives in my head as I stand before the goat, since the painting asks for a gaze and punishes the gaze with recognition. Goya’s deafness sealed him from ordinary sound and drove him deeper into sight; sight became ethical, a discipline of witness.¹⁴ When the crowd leans, it leans like parishioners at a sermon, like citizens at a proclamation, like jurors at a trial. Each open mouth carries an inaudible chorus. The one figure who meets us more directly—the pale face near centre-right—wears a glazed fatigue that belongs to people who have endured sermons, shaming, and public sorting.

Gender sharpens the dread. Witch discourse across Europe braided anxiety about women’s bodies with anxiety about unauthorized knowledge and communal fracture; women became convenient carriers of blame, nature’s cycles turned into a pretext for discipline. In Spain, where Marian devotion and penitential practice shaped daily rhythm, the rosary served as intimate object and public signal of orthodoxy, a small technology of protection and belonging. A broken rosary in mud therefore carries more than still-life meaning: it marks sanctioned piety’s failure to shield its most exposed carriers. Women in the crowd bear a double burden—stigma of superstition, exposure to punishment—while the goat offers a new liturgy that feeds on their vulnerability.¹⁵

Edges hold minor witnesses. On the far right, a hunched figure with a striped sleeve turns away, a recorder or guard whose role consists in attending and preserving the machinery’s smooth running; on the left, faces melt into shadow, the anonymous mass that supports every persecution while it preserves private anonymity. The image conducts a social inventory: presider, witnesses, accused, crowd, and the veiled hinge figure, positioned where a private self might slide into public confession. The beads lie like punctuation at that hinge, and each dot carries a question: what happens to mercy when it becomes performance, what happens to prayer when it becomes proof?

In Dublin a sermon once rose in a damp church off the canal, the priest’s voice soft as turf smoke, and the line from Wisdom came into my ear—the souls of the righteous are in the hand of God—yet outside, politics waited with its ledgers and uniforms, ready to sort people by the sound of their names. Here Goya paints that sorting as ritual, and the goat’s darkness accepts many identities: monarch, censor, inquisitor, demagogue, even the inner voice that offers safety in exchange for conformity. Public terror often begins inside private devotion, since a language meant for mercy can be pressed into the service of control. The beads remain small, easy to miss, yet they hold the moral fulcrum. Each dot retains the shape of a prayer once counted for protection; the cord snaps under pressure; the mud keeps the imprint as if memory itself had turned granular. Every age, when it gathers around a presider, decides again whether it will pray toward mercy or kneel toward power.

Scholia:

  1. Museo Nacional del Prado, installation information for the Black Paintings in the Villanueva Building, Room 67 (Madrid: Museo Nacional del Prado, gallery materials and collection guidance, various updates).
  2. Museo Nacional del Prado, collection entry for El aquelarre (o El gran cabrón) / Witches’ Sabbath, or the Great He-Goat, c. 1820–1823 (Madrid: Museo Nacional del Prado, catalogue entry with technique, provenance, dimensions, and current room listing).
  3. Room 67 trains the body before it trains the eye. Visitors drift toward Saturn and then back toward the goat, and the hush of shared attention behaves like a secular liturgy: a half-arc forms, pauses, leans, relaxes, reforms. That choreography tempts a reading of Goya’s painted semicircle as spectacle observed from safety, yet the room produces its own semicircle of onlookers whose appetite for explanation echoes the crowd inside the work. My gaze kept returning to the white-veiled back as if the painting offered a moral seat: either join the lean, or stand apart and carry the chill of separation. The image wounds most sharply at that point where looking becomes participation, and participation asks for a cost paid in conscience.
  4. Robert Hughes, Goya (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003), pp. 21–114; Valeriano Bozal, Francisco Goya: Vida y obra (Madrid: Tf Editores, 2005), pp. 399–447.
  5. Hughes, Goya (New York: Knopf, 2003), pp. 115–220, with discussion of Los Caprichos and The Disasters of War as moral and political speech carried through print.
  6. Manuela B. Mena Marqués (ed.), Goya: The Black Paintings (Madrid: Museo Nacional del Prado, 2009), pp. 27–79, on the Quinta cycle as domestic mural painting and on the psychic and spatial logic of the house-bound sequence.
  7. Antonio Brugada, Inventario de las pinturas de la Quinta del Sordo (Madrid: manuscript inventory, in critical editions and Prado documentation); Laurent Matheron, Goya (Paris: Plon, 1858), pp. 301–318; Prado collection documentation on titles and early descriptions (Madrid: Museo Nacional del Prado, archival notes and catalogue apparatus).
  8. Josep Fontana, The Collapse of the Spanish Monarchy, 1808–1823 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 197–286; Emilio La Parra López, Fernando VII: Un rey deseado y detestado (Barcelona: Tusquets, 2018), pp. 311–412.
  9. Hughes, Goya (New York: Knopf, 2003), pp. 417–445, on the late years, the political atmosphere, and the private wall as a place where public terror reappears as image.
  10. Janis A. Tomlinson, Goya: Images of Women (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), pp. 171–188; Nigel Glendinning, Goya and His Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), pp. 63–92, on the Osuna commissions and the earlier witchcraft scenes as social critique.
  11. Victor I. Stoichita and Anna Maria Coderch, Goya: The Last Carnival (London: Reaktion Books, 1999), pp. 117–149.
  12. The “rosary” remains a proposal rather than a catalogued certainty, and its strength lives in that very condition. In the reproduction provided, the dotted chain sits in the lowest band of the image—mud, scuff, brush-drag—where the eye skims past on its hunt for faces. The marks appear as a short run of dark nodes with a faint curvature and irregular spacing, close to the kneeler’s hem, occupying the ground between her and the goat’s address. A rosary, as object and habit, belongs to hands trained to count toward mercy, and Spain’s confessional rhythm had long taught such counting as daily refuge and public sign. A chain of beads reduced to pellets in mud therefore carries a double charge: devotion as intimate practice, devotion as material vulnerable to communal pressure. For the anthropology of witch discourse and the way devotional signs can flip into instruments of sorting and accusation, see Julio Caro Baroja, The World of the Witches (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 19–88; Marina Warner, Alone of All Her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 284–312.
  13. Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek (eds.), Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice: Preprints of a Symposium, University of Leiden, 26–29 June 1995 (Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 1995), pp. 12–29, 186–205; Salvador Martínez Cubells, reports and documentation on the nineteenth-century transfer (Madrid: Prado-related conservation records and references in conservation studies), passim; technical summaries and photographic campaigns associated with the Black Paintings’ material history in modern documentation. The transfer from wall to canvas changed more than support: it altered viewing distance, surface behaviour, and the legibility of low-register marks where abrasion concentrates. That technical fact sharpens a personal hesitation and a personal insistence: hesitation, since conservation work can shift the identity of tiny features; insistence, since any minute element that survives cutting, lifting, consolidation, and later cleaning gains a stubborn authority, like a prayer remembered after decades of forced forgetting.
  14. Hughes, Goya (New York: Knopf, 2003), pp. 417–445, on deafness, late solitude, and the ethics of looking in the Quinta years.
  15. Lyndal Roper, Witch Craze: Terror and Fantasy in Baroque Germany (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), pp. 1–38; Silvia Federici, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation (New York: Autonomedia, 2004), pp. 163–205. My own observation sits inside Goya’s faces: many of the women wear an expression that belongs to scrutiny more than ecstasy, as if the rite demanded visible agreement under threat of being named. Their bodies carry the burden of display—piety, shame, suspicion—while the goat’s darkness enjoys the luxury of distance, the posture of power that requires attendance from others.